Easter Revisited…

Easter LilyLast week I wrote an article about certain Christians questioning the validity of other Christians celebrating Easter because of the claim that Easter has its origins in paganism. (Maybe you should take another look at that blog just to refresh your memory.) The main thrust of my argument centered on the freedom that we have to contextualize the gospel in ways that our target culture will understand. Thus the fact that we use an Easter egg hunt as an outreach to the community so we can share the gospel of the Resurrected Christ is a case in point. Our intent is to share the gospel not to celebrate paganism.

The issue of intent raised a few red flags with some of my readers, so I want to revisit that. In the Chicago Tribune yesterday there was an article about gun-rights advocates calling Mark Kelly (the husband of Gabrielle Giffords) a hypocrite for buying a AR-15 assault weapon in Arizona. As you remember, since Giffords was shot and nearly killed she and Kelly have engaged in a high profile campaign to curb military-style weapon ownership. His intent in buying the weapon was to show how easy it was to obtain one with a minimal background check. So, is the charge of hypocrisy accurate given his intent? Even in Old Testament, Israel recognized the difference between murder and manslaughter as one of intent. Also, the key to the sacrificial system was not the bulls and goats, but the heart (the intent) of the worshipper. There is a very interesting example of intent in 1 Kings 5:18, 19. A converted Naaman asked Elisha if he would be forgiven when he had to accompany his king to the temple of Rimmon and there help the old man bow in worship, “and [consequently] I bow there also.” Elisha, usually very sensitive to idolatry, simply told him to “go in peace.” Elisha knew Naaman’s action of bowing, even in pagan temple, did not carry with it the intent of worship.

As well-reasoned as I think my arguments are, I know they will not be sufficient to convince those who have a strong conviction to the contrary. In the same way, they could not produce sufficient data on Easter and paganism to change my mind either. OK, so we have a standoff. Let’s solve the disagreement the good old fashioned American-Christian way; break fellowship and go start your own church. I think the tragedy in all of this is that in our attempt to love the Lord Jesus and to be faithful to His Word, we end up not loving each other and, therefore, being unfaithful to His Word. If we really desire to be biblical in our approach to dealing with disagreements on non-essentials (things not having to do with the centrality of the gospel), then we need to read Romans 14. “Accept him whose faith is weak, without passing judgment on disputable matters. One man’s faith allows him to eat everything, but another man, whose faith is weak, eats only vegetables.”

This entire passage deals with disagreements between Christians in the church at Rome who were going after each other because of “disputable matters.” Luther called them “pebble in the shoe” issues; annoying disputes which cannot be settled because each person is convinced in their own conscience that they hold the correct position. There were those whose consciences were “strong” and were convinced that they had the freedom to eat the meat sold at the temple meat-market (the only one in town), even though the animals from which the meat came were first sacrificed to a pagan deity. There were others in the church, however, who became vegetarians because they had a “weak” conscience— they believed that eating meat sacrificed to idols would make them participants in the pagan worship from which they had been converted. Although Paul identified more with the carnivores, he believed they were both right as long as they were acting according to their conscience. Where they were wrong, however, were in their attitudes toward each another. “The one who eats everything must not look down on him who does not, and the one who does not eat everything must not condemn the man who does, for God has accepted him… Therefore let us stop passing judgment on one another… Let us therefore make every effort to do what leads to peace and mutual edification… So whatever you believe about these things keep between yourself and God.”

According to the Scripture, then, being right about Easter and paganism takes a back seat to the love and unity which should be displayed by those who are in disagreement over the issue. If someone is fully convinced in his own mind on a disputable matter, even if we do not share that conviction, then God forbid that s/he should go against that conscience. “Accept one another, then, just as Christ accepted you, in order to bring praise to God” (Rom. 15:7).

8 thoughts on “Easter Revisited…

  1. Paul

    A Biblical analysis, no doubt. The problem lies in instances where we can’t even agree as to whether or not the matter is disputable, or are in agreement that it is not disputable but in disagreement as to the right and wrong of it. Who is the arbiter of what is, and what is not, disputable?

      1. Paul

        I have trouble seeing how the answer to that question settles the matter. Is there a point at which it should be taken to the church elders, a la Matthew 18:15-17?

      2. We can talk more about this offline, but can you give me an example of what you are thnking about? “Pebble in the shoe” issues are usually not brought before the elders.

  2. Nancy G. Rivard

    As David quoted Luther, “…a pebble in the shoe”. So often we loose sight of the truth. Because we are so busy arguing the “right” and the “wrong”. Our Lord has laid on your heart what is Right. Would He wants us to celebrate Easter? Or would He want us to get all tangled up in the understanding that it was first a pagan holiday? I would have to say that the pagan holiday has nothing to do with me! But Easter has everything to do with me! My Lord’s journey, from the cross, was complete and I have to proclaim from the deepest part of my very being, “Alleluia”! He has risen! Nothing can make me happier!
    We must never get so caught up in the “this and the that’ or “who’s right and who’s wrong” that we loose sight of Our Lord’s teachings in Matthew 22:39.
    Nice Job David!

  3. cathy machak

    Intent is so important. I do intend to thank Dave for his insight and for having the courage to say so. Well done, again Dave.

  4. bella

    A friend showed me the previous post and now this follow up post. This is unbelievable to me. How did the gun topic enter in on a conversation that should be
    addressing the way that the Lord Jesus wants us to worship Him? Didn’t he say we
    must worship him in Spirit and in Truth? He also said you worship you know not what
    to the Samaritan woman (John 4:22-24). Since when does the Bible say that God will accept anything we do for him just because we think it is right? Our intent has no
    bearing on the absolute truth of the Bible. Who can know the intent of the heart?
    God knows the intent of the heart and the Holy Ghost reveals our heart to us
    through the absolute truth of the Bible. It is time the “church” world stopped
    compromising God’s grace and mercy by aligning itself with the world. Easter egg hunts and worldly Roman Catholic celebrations have no place in the true church.
    It is time that “professing” Christians asked themselves if they are connected to the
    True Vine (John 15:1) or the vine of earth (Revelation 14:19)? Please provide a
    verse that specifically states that we can “contextualize” the works that God
    for ordained us to do (Ephesians 2:10). Contextualizing sounds like a fancy word
    for compromise. The scripture states in 2 Corinthians 6:14-18…what agreement
    hath the temple of God with idols….be ye separate saith the Lord, and touch not
    the unclean (thing),… Sharing the Gospel using pagan customs and celebrations
    is not lifting up the truth that Jesus came to give. He drove the money changers
    out of the temple and repeatedly referred to the Pharisees and scribes as vipers
    and snakes! Today’s churches are full of compromise. Please read Revelation 2
    and 3. These are warnings from the Lord Jesus to do the things that he REQUIRES
    of his church. There are 7 churches, ALL churches are represented in these 7. Jesus states 7 ways that each church must overcome and the reward for doing so. The first church, Ephesus, lost it’s first love (putting the Lord first). They risked losing
    their candlestick (which is the light of God, the Holy Ghost). This is NOT a matter
    of dietary preferences…this is a matter of how we WORSHIP! We cannot take an
    unclean thing and make it clean to be used in worship to our Lord (Job 14:4). We
    MUST worship the Lord Jesus Christ in Spirit and in Truth. If the church world does
    not know what that means, it is time that they find out!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s